Epistemic Openness and Perceptual Defeasibility [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):441 - 448 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bill Brewer contends that we should embrace a principle he calls : perceptual experiences provide reasons for empirical beliefs. He rejects traditional foundationalist and coherentist pictures of perception and perceptual justification and argues for a view on which perceptual experiences themselves intrinsically give reason for empirical beliefs. Brewer sees perceptual experience as conceptual; imbued with a content which gives a subject a perspective on the elements of his or her immediate environment. This ‘epistemic openness’ to the environment provided by perceptual content grounds the reason-giving role of experience.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic openness and perceptual defeasibility. [REVIEW]Michael G. F. Martin - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):441-448.
Law and defeasibility.Jaap Hage - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):221-243.
Perceptual entitlement.Tyler Burge - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):503-48.
Epistemic Defeasibility.Marshall Swain - 1974 - American Philosophical Quarterly 11 (1):15 - 25.
Defeasibility and open texture.Brian H. Bix - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Is defeasibility an essential property of law?Frederick Schauer - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Defeasibility and adjudication.Richard H. S. Tur - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
Defeasibility, axiological gaps, and interpretation.Riccardo Guastini - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
True exceptions : defeasibility and particularism.Bruno Celano - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 268--287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
42 (#361,008)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Martin
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Perception and conceptual content.Alex Byrne - 2013 - In Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Blackwell. pp. 231--250.
Perception and content.Bill Brewer - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):165-181.
Reasons for Belief.Hannah Ginsborg - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):286 - 318.
Explaining Perceptual Entitlement.Nicholas Silins - 2012 - Erkenntnis 76 (2):243-261.
Non-conceptual Experiential Content and Reason-giving.Hemdat Lerman - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):1-23.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references