Epistemic legitimizing strategies, commitment and accountability in discourse

Discourse Studies 13 (6):789-797 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hart offers a biologically based explanation for the use of an ‘epistemic positioning strategy’ aimed by speakers/writers at the legitimization of assertions, at persuading addressees of the veracity of the propositions, as a prior condition for the discursive legitimization of actions. This article focuses on various issues addressed in Hart’s article, among them the degree of commitment invoked in speakers/writers’ choice of epistemic stance expressions as legitimization strategies, as well as the expression of subjectivity/intersubjectivity in discourse and the degree to which this involves responsibility and accountability for the speaker/writer. The article also provides an alternative proposal of the categories identified by Bednarek for the conceptual domain of evidentiality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A communicative conception of discourse.Patrick Charaudeau - 2002 - Discourse Studies 4 (3):301-318.
No Commitment to the Truth.Anna-Maria A. Eder - 2021 - Synthese 198:7449-7472.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
10 (#1,165,120)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
The origins of meaning.James R. Hurford - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references