Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (1):19-37 (2009)
AbstractFollowing an initial discussion of the general nature of interpretation in contemporary psychology, and social and natural science, relevant views of Charles Taylor and Thomas Kuhn are considered in some detail. Although both Taylor and Kuhn agree that interpretation in the social or human sciences differs in some ways from interpretation in the natural sciences, they disagree about the nature and origins of such difference. Our own analysis follows, in which we consider differences in interpretation between the natural and social sciences in terms of Ian Hacking's use of Elizabeth Anscombe's conceptualization of actions as intentional acts under particular descriptions. We conclude that both Taylor and Kuhn are correct to point to differences in interpretation between the natural and social sciences. We also argue that in psychology, such interpretive differences, contra Kuhn and pro Taylor, are qualitative rather than quantitative. They arise from the nature of persons as self-interpretive, reactive beings who act under socioculturally sanctioned, linguistic descriptions. The actions of psychological persons may display qualitative differences over time and across contexts as these descriptions, including social scientific and psychological findings and interpretations, change. In contrast, even when descriptions in natural science change, such changes do not spawn changes in the self-interpretations and intentional actions of the focal phenomena of natural science. We also make the point that much current confusion surrounding interpretation in science arises from the unwarranted tendency of some commentators to treat interpretation as subjective, in ways that ignore the objective grounding of interpretation within regulated social practices, including scientific practices sanctioned by scientific communities
Similar books and articles
Interpretation in the Natural Sciences.Jan Faye - 2010 - In Dorato Mauro, Miklós Rédei & Mauricio Suárez (eds.), EPSA Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Launch of the European Philosophy of Sciences Association. Vol. 1-2. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 107-117.
The Interpretation of Texts, People and Other Artifacts.Daniel C. Dennett - 1990 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50:177-194.
Is Medicine a Social Science?Michael Martin - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (4):345-360.
Modal Semantics, Modal Dynamics and the Problem of State Preparation.Laura Ruetsche - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):25 – 41.
Natural Sciences as Textual Interpretation: The Hermeneutics of the Natural Sign.James Franklin - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (4):509-520.
Retracing One’s Steps: Searching for the Ethics of Legal Interpretation. [REVIEW]Susanna Lindroos-Hovinheimo - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (2):163-178.
'All This and so Much More': Understanding Interpretation Between Originalism and Antagonism.G. P. - unknown
Interpretation in Action: A Preliminary Inquiry.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2005 - In Fernando Mão de Ferro (ed.), A Explicação da Interpretação Humana (Portuguese). Edições Colibri.
What It Means to Interpret: A Standard Formulation and its Implicit Corollaries in Chinese Buddhism.Tao Jin - 2013 - Philosophy East and West 63 (2):153-175.
Why Plessy/Brown and Bowers/Lawrence Are Correct: Thomistic Natural Law as the Content of a Moral Constitutional Interpretation.Patrick J. Glen - unknown
The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness and the Propensity Interpretation of Probability.Isabelle Drouet & Francesca Merlin - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (S3):457-468.
Art as Its Own Interpretation.Nicholas Maxwell - 2003 - In Andreea Ruvoi (ed.), Interpretation and Its Objects: Studies in the Philosophy of Michael Krausz. Rodopi.
What Kind of Knowledge is Necessary for the Interpretation of Language?Jing Wang & Zhilin Zhang - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):409-423.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A Relational Conception of Emotional Development.Michael Mascolo - 2020 - Emotion Review 12 (4):212-228.
Integrating the Emic with the Etic —A Case of Squaring the Circle or for Adopting a Culture Inclusive Action Theory Perspective.Lutz H. Eckensberger - 2015 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45 (1):108-140.
References found in this work
Philosophy and the Human Sciences.Charles Taylor - 1985 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory.Ian Hacking - 1995 - Princeton University Press.