- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Digging beneath rules and similarity
Arthur B. Markman, Sergey Blok, Kyungil Kim, Levi Larkey, Lisa R. Narvaez, C. Hunt Stilwell & Eric Taylor
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):29-30 (2005)
Abstract
Pothos suggests dispensing with the distinction between rules and similarity, without defining what is meant by either term. We agree that there are problems with the distinction between rules and similarity, but believe these will be solved only by exploring the representations and processes underlying cases purported to involve rules and similarity.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
“Commitment” distinguishes between rules and similarity: A developmental perspective.Gil Diesendruck - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):21-22.
The rules versus similarity distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Preferring rules to similarity: Coherence, goals, and commitment.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):37-49.
In search of radical similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
Instantiated rules and abstract analogy: Not a continuum of similarity.Lee R. Brooks & Samuel D. Hannah - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):17-17.
Rules and similarity – a false dichotomy.James A. Hampton - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):26-26.
Is this what the debate on rules was about?Ulrike Hahn - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):25-26.
Rules, similarity, and threshold logic.Włodzisław Duch - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):23-23.
Rules work on one representation; similarity compares two representations.Todd M. Bailey - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):16-16.
Opposites detract: Why rules and similarity should not be viewed as opposite ends of a continuum.Gary Marcus - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):28-29.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
73 (#217,881)
6 months
7 (#350,235)
2009-01-28
Downloads
73 (#217,881)
6 months
7 (#350,235)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Eye movements reveal memory processes during similarity- and rule-based decision making.Agnes Scholz, Bettina von Helversen & Jörg Rieskamp - 2015 - Cognition 136 (C):228-246.
Linguistic and metalinguistic categories in second language learning.Karen Roehr - 2008 - Cognitive Linguistics 19 (1).
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo