Darwin and the Problem of Natural Nonbelief

The Monist 96 (3):349-376 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Problem one: why, if God designed the human mind, did it take so long for humans to develop theistic concepts and beliefs? Problem two: why would God use evolution to design the living world when the discovery of evolution would predictably contribute to so much nonbelief in God? Darwin was aware of such questions but failed to see their evidential significance for theism. This paper explores this significance. Problem one introduces something I call natural nonbelief, which is significant because it parallels and corroborates well-known worries about natural evil. Problems one and two, especially when combined, support naturalism over theism, intensify the problem of divine hiddenness, challenge Alvin Plantinga’s views about the naturalness of theism, and advance the discussion about whether the conflict between science and religion is genuine or superficial.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
3,960 (#1,910)

6 months
221 (#11,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Marsh
St. Olaf College

References found in this work

Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - Philosophia Christi 3 (2):327-328.
You just believe that because….Roger White - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):573-615.

View all 32 references / Add more references