Correction to: “The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (2):1-2 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The following correction will help establish more clearly and fully the ways in which I drew on Matteo Collodel’s work in the composition of this paper. Given that we were researching similar topics and that I was acquainted with his achievements.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s13194-019-0262-8

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

“The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests.Eric C. Martin - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):1-33.
“The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests.Eric C. Martin - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):1-33.
For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence.Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini - 1999 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini.
For and against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend, Matteo Motterlini. [REVIEW]Richard Brown - 2001 - Isis 92 (3):643-643.
For and against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence by Imre Lakatos; Paul Feyerabend; Matteo Motterlini. [REVIEW]Richard Brown - 2001 - Isis 92:643-643.
Brecht and Lukács as teachers of Feyerabend and Lakatos: the Feyerabend-Lakatos debate as scientific recapitulation of the Brecht- Lukács debate.Val Dusek - 1998 - History of the Human Sciences 11 (2):25-44.
Review of Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend and Matteo Motterlini: For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. [REVIEW]Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and against method: Including Lakatos's lectures on scientific method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend correspondence. [REVIEW]Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
For and Against Method, including Lakatos' Lectures on Scientific Method, and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. By Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. [REVIEW]J. Preston - 2002 - The European Legacy 7 (2):258-258.
Reconstructing Lakatos a Reassessment of Lakatos' Philosophical Project and Debates with Feyerabend in Light of the Lakatos Archive.Matteo Motterlini & London School of Economics and Political Science - 2001 - [Lse].
Lakatosowska periodyzacja twórczości Feyerabenda .Krzysztof J. Kilian - 2012 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 7 (4).
How Can a Taxonomy of Stances Help Clarify Classical Debates on Scientific Change?Hakob Barseghyan & Jamie Shaw - 2017 - Philosophies 2 (4):24.
Imre Lakatos i Paul Fayerabend czyli za i przeciw metodzie [recenzja] Paul K. Feyerabend, Ammazzando il tempo. Un'autobiografia, 1994. Imre Lakatos, Paul K. Feyerabend, Sull'orlo della scienza. Pro e contro il metodo, 1995. [REVIEW]Tadeusz Sierotowicz - 1996 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 18.
Letters.John Kadvany - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (3):364-364.
Feyerabend's Rationalism.Andrew Lugg - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):755 - 775.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-17

Downloads
18 (#781,713)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references