Brill’s Objections to the Future of Value Argument

Social Theory and Practice 31 (1):105-114 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Savulescu's objections to the future of value argument.Don Marquis - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):119-122.
Korcz's objections to the future-of-value argument.Don Marquis - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (1):56–60.
Jacobs’ objections to the future of value argument.Don Marquis - 2004 - Southwest Philosophy Review 20 (2):147-153.
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
Actors Are Not Like Zombies.E. Diaz-Leon - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):115-122.
Arguing forever? Or: Two tiers of argument appraisal.Trudy Govier - 1997 - In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale & A. V. Colman (eds.), Argumentation and Rhetoric. Vale.
A future like ours revisited.M. T. Brown - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):192-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
44 (#353,833)

6 months
16 (#149,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Personal Identity and Ethics.David Shoemaker - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references