Abortion and the argument from innocence

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):147-151 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX


There is an argument against abortion that should be rejected. It is the argument that abortion is the killing of an innocent human being, and since the killing of an innocent human being is immoral, abortion is therefore immoral. The major premise should be corrected to read: ?Generally speaking, the killing of innocent human beings is immoral'; for in some situations morality demands the killing of the innocent. Moreover, given the deep structure of English and the differences between unborn and born progeny, the question of whether a human fetus is a human being is best answered in the negative



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,549

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fetus as Human Being: Where is the Cut-off Point?Soroush Dabbagh - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 2:1-4.
Three Problems with the Impairment Argument.William Simkulet - 2022 - Asian Bioethics Review 15 (2):169-179.
The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion. [REVIEW]G. M. - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (3):549-550.
Tinkering and Abortion.Jan Narveson - 1978 - Dialogue 17 (1):125-128.
Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing.Don Marquis - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (6):363-369.
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
The Ethics of Abortion.Marc Alan Gellman - 1981 - Dissertation, Northwestern University


Added to PP

67 (#239,995)

6 months
14 (#257,487)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references