Referential vs. Non-referential World-Language Relations: How Do They Modulate Language Comprehension in 4 to 5-Year-Olds, Younger, and Older Adults? [Book Review]
Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2021)
Abstract
Age has been shown to influence language comprehension, with delays, for instance, in older adults' expectations about upcoming information. We examined to what extent expectations about upcoming event information change across the lifespan and as a function of different world-language relations. In a visual-world paradigm, participants in all three age groups inspected a speaker whose facial expression was either smiling or sad. Next they inspected two clipart agents depicted as acting upon a patient. Control scenes featured the same three characters without the action depictions. While inspecting the depictions, comprehenders listened to a German sentence [e.g., Den Marienkäfer kitzelt vergnügt der Kater; literally: “The ladybug tickles happily the cat ”]. Referential verb-action relations could, in principle, cue the cat-agent and so could non-referential relations via links from the speaker's smile to “happily” and the cat's smile. We examined variation in participants' visual anticipation of the agent before it was mentioned depending on participant age and whether the referentially mediated action depiction or the non-referentially associated speaker smile cued the agent. The action depictions rapidly boosted participants' visual anticipation of the agent, facilitating thematic role assignment in all age groups. By contrast, effects of the non-referentially cued speaker smile emerged in the younger adults only. We outline implications of these findings for processing accounts of the temporally coordinated interplay between listeners' age-dependent language comprehension, their interrogation of the visual context, and visual context influences.My notes
Similar books and articles
Embodiment Effects and Language Comprehension in Alzheimer's Disease.Marika De Scalzi, Jennifer Rusted & Jane Oakhill - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (5):890-917.
Maternal Socioeconomic Status Influences the Range of Expectations During Language Comprehension in Adulthood.Melissa Troyer & Arielle Borovsky - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S6).
Referential and Syntactic Processes: What develops?John C. Trueswell, Anna Papafragou & Youngon Choi - 2011 - In Edward Gibson & Neal J. Pearlmutter (eds.), The Processing and Acquisition of Reference. MIT Press. pp. 65.
The effect of speaker-specific information on pragmatic inferences.Daniel Grodner & Julie Sedivy - 2011 - In Edward Gibson & Neal J. Pearlmutter (eds.), The Processing and Acquisition of Reference. MIT Press.
Processing Speaker-Specific Information in Two Stages During the Interpretation of Referential Precedents.Edmundo Kronmüller & Ernesto Guerra - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
A common framework for language comprehension and language production?Robert J. Hartsuiker & Martin J. Pickering - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):887-888.
Language-guided visual processing affects reasoning: The role of referential and spatial anchoring.Magda L. Dumitru, Gitte H. Joergensen, Alice G. Cruickshank & Gerry T. M. Altmann - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (2):562-571.
The Influence of Shared Visual Context on the Successful Emergence of Conventions in a Referential Communication Task.Thomas F. Müller, James Winters & Olivier Morin - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (9).
Age differences in vocal emotion perception: on the role of speaker age and listener sex.Antarika Sen, Derek Isaacowitz & Annett Schirmer - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (6):1189-1204.
Can early years professionals determine which preschoolers have comprehension delays? A comparison of two screening tools.Emily Seager & Kirsten Abbot-Smith - unknown
English and Chinese children’s motion event similarity judgments.Yinglin Ji & Jill Hohenstein - 2018 - Cognitive Linguistics 29 (1):45-76.
Anticipation in Real‐World Scenes: The Role of Visual Context and Visual Memory.Moreno I. Coco, Frank Keller & George L. Malcolm - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (8):1995-2024.
Developmental Differences Between Children and Adults in the Use of Visual Cues for Segmentation.Ori Lavi-Rotbain & Inbal Arnon - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (S2):606-620.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-01-15
Downloads
1 (#1,499,562)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
2021-01-15
Downloads
1 (#1,499,562)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
German-speaking children use sentence-initial case marking for predictive language processing at age four.Duygu Özge, Jaklin Kornfilt, Katja Maquate, Aylin C. Küntay & Jesse Snedeker - 2022 - Cognition 221 (C):104988.
References found in this work
A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Marcel A. Just & Patricia A. Carpenter - 1992 - Psychological Review 99 (1):122-149.
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Timothy A. Salthouse - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):403-428.
The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children.John C. Trueswell, Irina Sekerina, Nicole M. Hill & Marian L. Logrip - 1999 - Cognition 73 (2):89-134.
The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted events.Pia Knoeferle, Matthew W. Crocker, Christoph Scheepers & Martin J. Pickering - 2005 - Cognition 95 (1):95-127.
The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking.Pia Knoeferle & Matthew W. Crocker - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (3):481-529.