The Poverty of Essentialism in the Philosophy of Technology

Journal of Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities 85 (21):69-89 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Essentialism is one of the common approaches in the philosophy of technology. Based on this approach, technology has an independent essence, and knowing technology requires knowing this essence. The present article aims to criticize essentialism in the philosophy of technology in the framework of critical rationalism. The paper argues that essentialism is inadequate because it leads to irrationalism and determinism and destroys any ground for reform and critical discussion about technology; instead, it recommends sudden and irrational changes. Secondly, it contains some presuppositions and false doctrines about the evolution of technology and its relation to humans. We will also explain that essentialists’ recommendation to take refuge in art or hold a free relationship towards technology is inconclusive in facing technological inconveniences. Instead, local considerations should be taken into account in the modification process, and they should be carried out piecemeal and in a critical context.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What's wrong with being a technological essentialist? A response to Feenberg.Iain Thomson - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):429 – 444.
Concerning Technology.Tracy Colony - 2009 - Idealistic Studies 39 (1-3):23-34.
Thinking Essence, Thinking Technology: A Response to Don Ihde’s Charge.Bowen Zha - 2020 - Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):1-10.
Avicennian essentialism.Fedor Benevich - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (3):410-433.
Postphenomenology or Essentialism?Alexander Castleton Flores - 2022 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 26 (1):57-83.
Senses of Essence.Kit Fine - 1995 - In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Diana Raffman & Nicholas Asher (eds.), Modality, Morality and Belief. Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 53-73.
Concerning Technology.Tracy Colony - 2009 - Idealistic Studies 39 (1-3):23-34.
What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism.Marc Ereshefsky - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
New Essentialism in Biology.Olivier Rieppel - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):662-673.
How Scientific Is Scientific Essentialism?Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (1):85-101.
Essentialism, Externalism, and Human Nature.M. J. Cain - 2012 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70:29-51.
Essentialism in quantified modal logic.Thomas J. McKay - 1975 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (4):423 - 438.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-30

Downloads
114 (#144,443)

6 months
59 (#64,601)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alireza Mansouri
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references