The nature of science. A dialogue

Synthese 196 (3):775-793 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this dialogue the view of Paul Hoyningen-Huene as defended in Systematicity. The Nature of Science is presented and criticized. The approach is developed dialectically by the two interlocutors, a series of critical points are debated and an alternative view is introduced. The dialogical form is intended to honor the general philosophical approach of the author summarized in the last sentence of the book, where he states that he sees philosophy as an ongoing, open-ended dialogue.

Similar books and articles

The Ethical Project. A Dialogue.C. Mantzavinos - 2012 - Analyse & Kritik 34 (1):21-38.
Systematicity: The Nature of Science.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2013 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Strengths of Public Dialogue on Science‐related Issues.Roland Jackson, Fiona Barbagallo & Helen Haste - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (3):349-358.
Intersystemarer dialog in wissenschaftstheorie und -geschichte.Bardo Diehl - 1985 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 16 (2):213-228.
God and the Dinosaurs Revisited.Peter Dodson - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 243--250.
Systematicity and the Continuity Thesis.K. Brad Wray - 2019 - Synthese 196 (3):819-832.
Utopia@SecondMillennium. Daedalus_MeetsJob.George Myerson - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (1):79-92.
Dialogue and the Human Being as Homo Creator.Janusz Kuczyński - 2013 - Dialogue and Universalism 23 (3):63-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-30

Downloads
194 (#99,535)

6 months
43 (#89,954)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

C. Mantzavinos
University of Athens

Citations of this work

Replies.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2019 - Synthese 196 (3):907-928.

Add more citations