Neo-Scholastic Philosophy in the United States

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 33:127-136 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00657638

DOI

10.5840/acpaproc1959336

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Nations of Immigrants: Do Words Matter?Donna R. Gabaccia - 2010 - The Pluralist 5 (3):5-31.
Un-American about Animals.Peter Singer - unknown
Un-american about animals the boston globe , August 20, 2005.Peter Singer - manuscript
On a comprehensive theory of Xing (naturality) in song-Ming neo-confucian philosophy: A critical and integrative development.Chung-ying Cheng - 1997 - Philosophy East and West 47 (1):33-46.
The Crisis in Neo-Scholastic Philosophy.Robert F. Harvanek - 1963 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 38 (4):529-546.
The significance of Clemens Baeumker in neo-scholastic philosophy.August Bogdanski - 1942 - Milwaukee, Wis.,: Marquette university press.
Sustainable development and air quality: The need to replace basic technologies with cleaner alternatives.David M. Driesen - manuscript
The neo-scholastic critique of Nicolai Hartmann.James Collins - 1945 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6 (1):109-132.
Possibilities of a Neo-Scholastic Philosophy of Law in the United States Today.Linus Lilly - 1936 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 12:111-117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#747,345)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references