Epistemic “Holes” in Space-Time

Philosophy of Science 83 (2):265-276 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A number of models of general relativity seem to contain “holes” that are thought to be “physically unreasonable.” One seeks a condition to rule out these models. We examine a number of possibilities already in use. We then introduce a new condition: epistemic hole-freeness. Epistemic hole-freeness is not just a new condition—it is new in kind. In particular, it does not presuppose a distinction between space-times that are “physically reasonable” and those that are not.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
116 (#160,532)

6 months
40 (#113,154)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jb Manchak
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

A Hierarchy of Spacetime Symmetries: Holes to Heraclitus.J. B. Manchak & Thomas Barrett - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Is the Universe As Large As It Can Be?John Byron Manchak - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (6):1341-1344.
Singularities and Black holes.Erik Curiel - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Epistemic Holes and Determinism in Classical General Relativity.Juliusz Doboszewski - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (3):1093-1111.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What Is a Physically Reasonable Space-Time?John Byron Manchak - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (3):410-420.
On Space-Time Singularities, Holes, and Extensions.John Byron Manchak - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (5):1066-1076.

Add more references