- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Ethical Complexity and Precaution When Parents and Doctors Disagree About Treatment
American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):49-55 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Unproven treatment in childhood oncology--how far should paediatricians co-operate?J. Jackson - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (2):77-79.
Futile treatment, junior doctors and role virtues.R. McDougall - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):646-649.
The zone of parental discretion: An ethical tool for dealing with disagreement between parents and doctors about medical treatment for a child.Lynn Gillam - 2016 - Clinical Ethics 11 (1):1-8.
A Prudential Argument for Precaution under Uncertainty and High Risk.Stephen Haller - 2000 - Ethics and the Environment 5 (2):175-189.
Deciding for imperilled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy?H. E. McHaffie - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):104-109.
Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment?Tara Nair, Julian Savulescu, Jim Everett, Ryan Tonkens & Dominic Wilkinson - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (12):831-840.
The zone of parental discretion and the complexity of paediatrics: A response to Alderson.Rosalind McDougall, Lynn Gillam, Merle Spriggs & Clare Delany - 2018 - Clinical Ethics 13 (4):172-174.
Overriding parents’ medical decisions for their children: a systematic review of normative literature.Rosalind J. McDougall & Lauren Notini - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):448-452.
Balancing obligations: should written information about life-sustaining treatment be neutral?Vicki Xafis, Dominic Wilkinson, Lynn Gillam & Jane Sullivan - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (3):234-239.
Why Charlie Gard’s parents should have been the decision-makers about their son’s best interests.Raanan Gillon - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):462-465.
A Costly Separation Between Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment in Intensive Care.Dominic Wilkinson & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (3):127-137.
Understanding doctors' ethical challenges as role virtue conflicts.Rosalind Mcdougall - 2011 - Bioethics 27 (1):20-27.
Primary care confidentiality for Spanish adolescents: fact or fiction?M. D. Perez-Carceles - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (6):329-334.
The parents' ability to take care of their baby as a factor in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-prolonging treatment in two Dutch NICUs.S. Moratti - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):336-338.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-08-24
Downloads
20 (#723,940)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
2018-08-24
Downloads
20 (#723,940)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Family conflict and aggression in the paediatric intensive care unit: Responding to challenges in practice.Shreerupa Basu & Anne Preisz - forthcoming - Clinical Ethics:147775092210910.
Empirical Over Theoretical Ethics: Choosing What Matters to Patients and Families.Annie Janvier & Marlyse F. Haward - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):54-56.
References found in this work
The zone of parental discretion: An ethical tool for dealing with disagreement between parents and doctors about medical treatment for a child.Lynn Gillam - 2016 - Clinical Ethics 11 (1):1-8.
Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):9-19.
When Parents Refuse: Resolving Entrenched Disagreements Between Parents and Clinicians in Situations of Uncertainty and Complexity.Janine Penfield Winters - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):20-31.
Harm isn't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child: Table 1.Dominic Wilkinson & Tara Nair - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):116-118.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo