Descartes and the Bologna affair

British Journal for the History of Science 47 (1):1-13 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Descartes is well known as a mathematician and natural philosopher. However, none of Descartes's biographers has described the invitation he received in 1633 to fill a chair in theoretical medicine at the University of Bologna, or the fact that he was already sufficiently known and respected for his medical knowledge that the invitation came four years before his first publication. In this note I authenticate and contextualize this event, which I refer to as the ‘Bologna affair’. I transcribe the letter written to the Bolognese Senate announcing efforts to bring Descartes to the university and explain the events that led to Descartes receiving the invitation. While many questions about the Bologna affair cannot be answered because of the paucity of the historical record, I conclude that the event invites us to consider again the larger historiographical issue of how best to integrate the history of medicine with the history of science and philosophy during the early modern period.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes and the Corporeal Mind: Some Implications of the Regius Affair.Catherine Wilson - 2000 - In John Schuster, Stephen Gaukroger & John Sutton (eds.), Descartes' Natural Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 659--79.
Descartes on the Heartbeat: The Leuven Affair.Lucian Petrescu - 2013 - Perspectives on Science 21 (4):397-428.
Descartes' physiology and its relation to his psychology.Gary Hatfield - 1992 - In John Cottingham (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 335--370.
Descartes among the Scholastics.Roger Ariew - 2011 - Boston: Brill. Edited by Roger Ariew.
The Relevance of Descartes's Philosophy for Modern Philosophy of Science.Gerd Buchdahl - 1963 - British Journal for the History of Science 1 (3):227-249.
Descartes.Akinori Hayashi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:133-140.
Descartes and First Person Authority.Steven L. Reynolds - 1992 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (2):181-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
44 (#351,926)

6 months
30 (#103,657)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

René Descartes.Gary Hatfield - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Descartes’s Metaphysical Biology.Gideon Manning - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (2):209-239.
Walter Charleton, wellbeing, and the Cartesian passions.Maks Sipowicz - 2023 - Intellectual History Review 33 (4):609-628.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Descartes and the tree of knowledge.Roger Ariew - 1992 - Synthese 92 (1):101 - 116.
The pen and the Sword: Recovering the disciplinary identity of physiology and anatomy before 1800 - I: Old physiology-the pen.Andrew Cunningham - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (4):631-665.
Descartes, the Sceptics, and the Rejection of Vitalism in Seventeenth-Century Physiology.Phillip R. Sloan - 1977 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 8 (1):1.
The pen and the sword: recovering the disciplinary identity of physiology and anatomy before 1800.Andrew Cunningham - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (4):631-665.
Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne, Religieux Minime.Marin Mersenne & Paul Tannery - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 16 (2):265-265.

View all 7 references / Add more references