Assessing the consequences of decentralizing biomedical research
Big Data and Society 6 (1) (2019)
Abstract
Advancements in technology are shifting the ways that biomedical data are collected, managed, and used. The pervasiveness of connected devices is expanding the types of information that are defined as ‘health data.’ Additionally, cloud-based mechanisms for data collection and distribution are shifting biomedical research away from traditional infrastructure towards a more distributed and interconnected ecosystem. This shift provides an opportunity for us to reimagine the roles of scientists and participants in health research, with the potential to more meaningfully engage in partnership across the research process. At the same time, these emerging practices present a potential to expose research participants to unanticipated and unintended consequences. Social norms and policy can help to mitigate these risks, but their development is often slow relative to the pace of technological advances and, as such, they can become reactive rather than prospective. As an alternative, the integrated development of data governance structures within technological advancements, supports their effective implementation, evaluation and evolution in a manner that can balance the benefits and risks of biomedical researcher in a decentralized ecosystem.My notes
Similar books and articles
Human Subjects Protections in Biomedical Enhancement Research: Assessing Risk and Benefit and Obtaining Informed Consent.Maxwell J. Mehlman & Jessica W. Berg - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (3):546-549.
Exploring the risk/benefit balance in biomedical research: some considerations.Derrick E. Aarons - 2017 - Revista Bioética 25 (2):320-327.
The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research.Andrea Wiggins & John Wilbanks - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):3-14.
Concealment and Discovery: The Role of Information Security in Biomedical Data Re-Use.N. Tempini & Leonelli Sabina - forthcoming - Social Studies of Science.
Trust me, I’m a researcher!: The role of trust in biomedical research.Angeliki Kerasidou - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (1):43-50.
Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape.Angela G. Villanueva, Robert Cook-Deegan, Barbara A. Koenig, Patricia A. Deverka, Erika Versalovic, Amy L. McGuire & Mary A. Majumder - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (1):21-30.
Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data.Oscar A. Zarate, Julia Green Brody, Phil Brown, Monica D. Ramirez-Andreotta, Laura Perovich & Jacob Matz - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (1):36-45.
Four Paradigms of Clinical Research and Research Oversight.Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Christine Grady - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):82-96.
Giving Voice to Patients: Developing a Discussion Method to Involve Patients in Translational Research.Simone Burg, Elisa Garcia, Lieke Scheer & Marianne Boenink - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (3):181-197.
The National Center for Biomedical Ontology: Advancing Biomedicine through Structured Organization of Scientific Knowledge. Rubin - 2012 - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 19 (2):190-195.
Ethical considerations in the biomedical research: analysis of national biomedical research ethics guidelines in Iran.Amirhossein Mardani, Maryam Nakhoda, Alireza Noruzi & Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 12.
Limits on risks for healthy volunteers in biomedical research.David B. Resnik - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (2):137-149.
A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):211-228.
A qualitative study using traditional community assemblies to investigate community perspectives on informed consent and research participation in western Kenya.Rachel Vreeman, Eunice Kamaara, Allan Kamanda, David Ayuku, Winstone Nyandiko, Lukoye Atwoli, Samuel Ayaya, Peter Gisore, Michael Scanlon & Paula Braitstein - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):23-.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-24
Downloads
1 (#1,501,023)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2020-11-24
Downloads
1 (#1,501,023)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Co-design and ethical artificial intelligence for health: An agenda for critical research and practice.James A. Shaw & Joseph Donia - 2021 - Big Data and Society 8 (2).
Wearables, the Marketplace and Efficiency in Healthcare: How Will I Know That You’re Thinking of Me?Mark Howard - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1545-1568.
References found in this work
Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide.Kate Crawford & Jacob Metcalf - 2016 - Big Data and Society 3 (1).
Collective Action, Property Rights, and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal.Elinor Ostrom & Arun Agrawal - 2001 - Politics and Society 29 (4):485-514.