History of European Ideas 44 (4):449-460 (2018)

Reidar Maliks
University of Oslo
ABSTRACTCan there be a legal or a moral right to resist the government? Scholarly interest in the right of resistance has rarely focused on German philosophy, which has often been considered unusually committed to authority. Yet, during the Enlightenment German philosophers regularly attempted to justify not just conscientious refusal but also revolution. This essay explores the two dominant justifications, which were based in Wolffian perfectionism and Kantian relational theory. It argues that we can best understand the complexity of these theories of resistance by exploring their contrasting views on the state’s purpose: providing material and spiritual welfare, or establishing freedom as independence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01916599.2018.1473959
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

John Locke in the German Enlightenment: An Interpretation.Klaus P. Fischer - 1975 - Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (3):431.
The Basis of the Right to Resistance in the Legal Thought of Arthur Kaufmann.José-Antonio Santos - 2009 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 95 (3):352-358.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #954,515 of 2,518,713 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,713 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes