The Best Essay Ever: the fallacy of wishful thinking

Review of Contemporary Philosophy 12 (1):30-42 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It is argued that wishful thinking is an informal logical fallacy and is distinguished from self-deception and delusion. Wishful thinking is unique in that a human desire is the starting point, which remains unfulfilled because of insufficient or no evidence or ignorance, despite the agent’s beliefs. It contrasts with self-deception, a more serious mental state in which the agent hides or denies the truth from himself, regardless of whether it is desired. Wishful thinking is a logical fallacy, depending on the agent’s genuine beliefs as an epistemic dilemma or merely a harmless fantasy. pp. 30–42



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Is Wishful Seeing Like Wishful Thinking?Susanna Siegel - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2):408-435.
How not to avoid wishful thinking.Mark Schroeder - 2010 - In Michael Brady (ed.), New Waves in Metaethics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
The elusive wishful thinking effect.Maya Bar-Hillel & David Budescu - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (1):71 – 103.
A Defense of Evolutionary Ethics.Robert Richards - 1986 - Biology and Philosophy 1 (3):265-293.
Wishful Thinking and "The Will to Believe".Stephen T. Davis - 1972 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 8 (4):231 - 245.
How Noncognitivists Can Avoid Wishful Thinking.David Enoch - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):527-545.


Added to PP

335 (#43,514)

6 months
32 (#64,581)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Maller
Duquesne University (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references