Revolutionary epigones: Kant and his radical followers

History of Political Thought 33 (4):647-671 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When Kant in 1793 rejected a right of revolution, he was immediately criticized by a group of radical followers who argued that he had betrayed his own principles of justice. Jakob, Erhard, Fichte, Bergk and Schlegel proceeded to defend a right of resistance and revolution based on what they took to be his true principles. I argue that we must understand Kant's Metaphysics of Morals, which came in 1797, partly as a response to these radical democratic writings. Exploring this forgotten controversy reveals that Kant did not betray his own principles when he denied a right of revolution, because he did not mean that persons have an unconditional duty to obey. This becomes clear when we read the final developments of Kant's thinking on individual liberty and republican government in light of the radical critique

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review: Kant, Immanuel, On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy.Allen W. Wood - 2011 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 15:96-117.
Kant's Copernican revolution.Ermanno Bencivenga - 1987 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant's Theory of Justice.Thomas W. Pogge - 1988 - Kant Studien 79 (1-4):407-433.
Prussian Polis: Kant's democratic republicanism.Reidar Maliks - 2009 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (4):427-445.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
18 (#781,713)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Reidar Maliks
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Introduction to J. B. Erhard’s ‘Devil’s Apology’.James Clarke - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (1):183-193.
The Bloomsbury Companion to Kant.Dennis Schulting (ed.) - 2015 - London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references