Hegel Bulletin 32 (1-2):216-231 (2011)

Authors
Reidar Maliks
University of Oslo
Abstract
This article explores the writings of Ludwig Heinrich Jakob and Johann Benjamin Erhard, two young Kantians who produced original defences of resistance and revolution during the 1790's. Comparing these two neglected philosophers reveals a crucial divergence in the liberal theory of revolution between a perspective that emphasises resistance by the individual and another that emphasises revolution by the nation. The article seeks to contribute to a more nuanced view of the political theory of the German Enlightenment, which has often been presented as excessively obedient to authority.The historian Charles Ingrao repeated a common perception when, in an article on enlightened absolutism, he speculated that, ‘the German's greater acceptance of authority both then and now may be rooted in their own distinctive national culture’. This idea of the obedient German has been promoted especially by those who seek cultural explanations for the authoritarian bent of German society in the 20thcentury. But the idea has a longer history. Herder described Germany as the land of obedience, and Kant wrote that, ‘in keeping with their penchant for law and order, they [the Germans] will rather submit to despotic treatment than venture on innovations ’. By ‘wilful reforms of government’ Kant meant revolution. Madame de Staël later observed that Germans ‘join the greatest boldness of thought to the most obedient character’. As Frederick Beiser has shown, this view, which was repeated by Heine and Marx, came to dominate the historiography.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0263523200000239
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Revolution.E. J. Hobsbawm & Hanna Arendt - 1965 - History and Theory 4 (2):252.
Theory and Practice.Jürgen Habermas & John Viertel - 1975 - Studies in Soviet Thought 15 (4):341-351.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Introduction to J. B. Erhard’s ‘Devil’s Apology’.James Clarke - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (1):183-193.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Revolutionary Epigones: Kant and His Radical Followers.Reidar Maliks - 2012 - History of Political Thought 33 (4):647-671.
Erhard Albrecht.Erhard Albrecht - 1960 - Atti Del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia 3:480-481.
The New Spirit of Capitalism in European Liberal Arts Programs.Jakob Claus, Thomas Meckel & Farina Pätz - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (11):1011-1019.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-04

Total views
9 ( #954,737 of 2,519,700 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,700 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes