Kantian Review 18 (1):29-47 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This paper argues that, although no resistance or revolution is permitted in the Kantian state, very tyrannical regimes must not be obeyed because they do not qualify as states. The essay shows how a state ceases to be a state, argues that persons have a moral responsibility to judge about it and defends the compatibility of this with Kantian authority. The reconstructed Kantian view has implications for how we conceive authority and obligation. It calls for a morally demanding definition of the state and asserts that the primary personal responsibility is not to evaluate the morality of every single law but to evaluate the moral standing of the polity.Send article to KindleTo send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply. Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.Kant, the State, and RevolutionVolume 18, Issue 1Reidar Maliks DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415412000271Your Kindle email address Please provide your Kindle [email protected]@kindle.com Available formats PDF Please select a format to send. By using this service, you agree that you will only keep articles for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services. Please confirm that you accept the terms of use. Cancel Send ×Send article to Dropbox To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox. Kant, the State, and RevolutionVolume 18, Issue 1Reidar Maliks DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415412000271Available formats PDF Please select a format to send. By using this service, you agree that you will only keep articles for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services. Please confirm that you accept the terms of use. Cancel Send ×Send article to Google Drive To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive. Kant, the State, and RevolutionVolume 18, Issue 1Reidar Maliks DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415412000271Available formats PDF Please select a format to send. By using this service, you agree that you will only keep articles for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services. Please confirm that you accept the terms of use. Cancel Send ×Export citation.
|
Keywords | authority judgement Kant revolution the state |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/s1369415412000271 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy.Arthur Ripstein - 2009 - Harvard University Press.
Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy,.Hannah Arendt & Ronald Beiner - 1982 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56 (2):386-386.
Kant's Non-Voluntarist Conception of Political Obligations: Why Justice is Impossible in the State of Nature.Helga Varden - 2008 - Kantian Review 13 (2):1-45.
Reason, Right, and Revolution: Kant and Locke.Katrin Flikschuh - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (4):375-404.
View all 9 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Realizing Freedom as Non-Domination: Political Obligation in Kant’s Doctrine of Right.Robert Patrick Whelan - 2022 - Res Publica 28 (1):85-101.
Immanuel Kant Poliittisena Teoreetikkona Ja Intellektuellina.Anitta Kananen - 2021 - Dissertation, University of Jyväskylä
Similar books and articles
A Reconciliation of Kant's Views on Revolution.Chris W. Surprenant - 2005 - Interpretation 32 (2):151-169.
Kant's Transcendental Deduction of Political Authority.Kevin Thompson - 2001 - Kant Studien 92 (1):62-78.
Moral Community: Escaping the Ethical State of Nature.Kyla Ebels-Duggan - 2009 - Philosophers' Imprint 9.
Kant on the State, Law, and Obedience to Authority in the Alleged 'Anti-Revolutionary' Writings.Kenneth R. Westphal - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:383-426.
Political Authority, Moral Powers and the Intrinsic Value of Obedience.William A. Edmundson - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):179-191.
Shame and Punishment in Kant's Doctrine of Right.David Sussman - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):299–317.
“Hobbes Is of the Opposite Opinion” Kant and Hobbes on the Three Authorities in the State.Paul Guyer - 2012 - Hobbes Studies 25 (1):91-119.
The Moral Source of the Kantian Sublime.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2012 - In Timothy Costelloe (ed.), The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present (pp. 37-49). Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-03-09
Total views
78 ( #149,850 of 2,517,900 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #206,126 of 2,517,900 )
2013-03-09
Total views
78 ( #149,850 of 2,517,900 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #206,126 of 2,517,900 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads