How old is human brutality?

Common Knowledge 22 (1):81-104 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given the paucity of evidence available, scholarship in archaeology and the social sciences is deeply divided over the question, how old is human violence? Some scholars have concluded that humans are intrinsically violent, and others that they are basically nonviolent, but in both interpretive schools there is a pronounced tendency to rely on simple naturalist epistemology. In contrast, this article offers an interpretation focusing on the structural foundations of violent action. Instead of tracing violent or nonviolent behavior to “human nature,” the origins of violence are linked to the rise and proliferation of complex social organizations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reflections on Waldron’s Archetypes.Michael Plaxton - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (1):77-103.
Evolutionary Explanation of Psychopaths.Seungbae Park - 2013 - International Journal of Social Science Studies 1 (2):1-7.
Good and Evil Morality.Michael Kaye - 1941 - Philosophy 16 (61):27 - 38.
Narcissism, Fundamentalism and Cosmological Ingratitude.Charles W. Harvey - 2008 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (2):41-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
23 (#661,981)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sinisa Malesevic
University College Dublin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references