FDA’s toothless tiger and its “lost pleasure” analysis

Abstract

In 2009, amidst much fanfare, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was given the authority to regulate tobacco products when Congress passed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Ostensibly, the Act provided the FDA with the legal authority to regulate the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of tobacco products. There was a frisson of hope in some circles that at last, the process begun in the 1990s when David Kessler first attempted to regulate tobacco and was legally stymied by an industry lawsuit would finally come to fruition—and the makers of the world's most deadly consumer products would be brought to heel in the interest of consumer protection. In practice, however, …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Cognitive pleasure and distress.Irwin Goldstein - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 39 (January):15-23.
Malicious pleasure evaluated: Is pleasure an unconditional good?Irwin Goldstein - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):24–31.
Humean Pleasures Reconsidered.Stephen D. Hudson - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (4):545 - 562.
Two Questions about Pleasure.Fred Feldman - 1988 - In D. F. Austin (ed.), Philosophical Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 59-81.
Happiness, Pleasure, and Belief.Edward Skidelsky - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (3):435-446.
Pleasure.C. C. W. Taylor - 1963 - Analysis 23 (January):2-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-08

Downloads
3 (#1,650,745)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references