Family coercion and valid consent
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2) (1986)
AbstractCoercion is commonly said to invalidate consent, and that is always true if the source of the coercion is the physician. However, if it is a family member who coerces the patient to consent, the resultant consent may be quite valid and treatment should proceed.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.
Similar books and articles
A Puzzle About Consent in Research and in Practice.Eric Chwang - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (3):258-272.
The Possibility of Choice: Three Accounts of the Problem with Coercion.Japa Pallikkathayil - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11.
Consent and Informational Responsibility.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
Rationally Justifying Political Coercion.Russell Hardin - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:79-91.
Reflection on Family Consent: Based on a Pregnant Death in a Beijing Hospital.Xinqing Zhang - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (3):164-168.
A Model of Community Substituted Consent for Research on the Vulnerable.David C. Thomasma - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (1):47-57.