Melissus And His Opponents: The Argument of DK 30 B 8

Phronesis 50 (4):263-288 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper I offer a new interpretation of Melissus' argument at DK 30 B8. In this passage Melissus uses an Eleatic argument against change to challenge an opponent who appeals to the authority of perception in order to support the view that there are a plurality of items in the world. I identify an orthodox type of approach to this passage, but argue that it cannot give a charitable interpretation of Melissus' strategy. In order to assess Melissus' overall argument we have to identify the opponent at whom it is aimed. The orthodox interpretation of the argument faces a dilemma: Melissus' argument is either a poor argument against a plausible opponent or a good argument against an implausible opponent. My interpretation turns on identifying a new target for Melissus' argument. I explain the position I call Bluff Realism (contrasting it with two other views: the Pig Headed and the Fully Engaged). These are positions concerning the dialectical relation between perception on the one hand, and arguments to counterperceptual conclusions on the other. I argue that Bluff Realism represents a serious threat from an Eleatic point of view, and is prima facie an attractive position in its own right. I then give a charitable interpretation of Melissus' argument in DK 30 B8, showing how he produces a strong and incisive argument against the Bluff Realist position I have identified. Melissus emerges as an innovative and astute philosopher



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The use of philosophical arguments in quantum physics.John Losee - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (1):10-17.
Eleatic Monism in Zeno and Melissus.Patricia Kenig Curd - 1993 - Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):1-22.
Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
Parmenides, Melissus and Gorgias. A Reinterpretation of Eleatic Philosophy.M. C. Scholar - 1965 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 3 (2):255-260.
Melissus' Way of Seeming?Peter Bicknell - 1982 - Phronesis 27 (1):194-201.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias.A. E. F. - 1962 - Review of Metaphysics 15 (3):526-526.
Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias. [REVIEW]Felix M. Cleve - 1963 - New Scholasticism 37 (2):255-258.


Added to PP

67 (#244,215)

6 months
25 (#115,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen A. Makin
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

Presocratic philosophy.Patricia Curd - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stronger Reality.Enrico Piergiacomi - 2014 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 158 (2):306-319.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references