Cassirer, Langer, and Dilthey on the Distinctive Kinds of Symbolism in the Arts

Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 2 (1):7-20 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the ways in which Ernst Cassirer and Susanne Langer place the arts in the spectrum of symbolization. Langer claims that Cassirer is wrong to consider artistic symbolism as a more concrete mode of linguistic symbolism. Instead, artists create presentational symbols that are just as capable of formal articulation, i. e., of complex combinations, as words are. According to Langer, the presentational modes of articulation of music and the visual arts are altogether different from the syntactical mode that governs language. I argue that the way Langer imposes her presentational model on the literary arts goes too far in decontextualizing them from the real world. Thus I propose a more inclusive artistic spectrum which proceeds from Langer’s presentational symbolism to the typifying mode of symbolization suggested by Wilhelm Dilthey to Cassirer’s more ideational linguistic mode.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sculpture and Space.Robert Hopkins - 2003 - In Matthew Kieran & Dominic Lopes (eds.), Imagination, Philosophy, and the Arts. Routledge. pp. 272-290.
Connections.Jean Y. Audigier - 1991 - University Press of America.
The Enjoyment of the Arts. [REVIEW]Langer Langer - 1944 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5:608.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-12

Downloads
20 (#744,405)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rudolf Makkreel
Emory University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references