Phronesis 44 (2):114-126 (1999)

Authors
Stephen A. Makin
University of Sheffield
Abstract
This paper offers an interpretation of the arguments Aristotle offers in "Metaphysics" 9.4, 1047b14-30, for the two modal theses [1] if (if A is the case then B is the case) then (if A is possible then B is possible) [2] if (if A is possible then B is possible) then (if A is the case then B is the case) Aristotle's arguments for these theses have not typically impressed commentators. I offer two arguments which are relatively faithful to Aristotle's text. The arguments rest on the following pair of claims concerning conditionals and possibility respectively [COND] 'if A then B' is true if and only if in any circumstances in which A obtains, B obtains also [TEST] 'possibly A' is true in a range of circumstances C1... $\text{C}_{\text{n}}$ if and only if assuming A true in any C1 gives rise to no impossibilities, once any further required adjustments are taken into account The arguments and the premises on which they rest are stated without formalisation of the theses [1] and [2]. The argument for [1] is a defensible and persuasive argument. The argument for [2] is invalid, though plausible. That is consistent with our differential verdicts on [1] and [2]. [2] appears to be false: the argument provided for [2] explains why Aristotle might nevertheless have asserted it. The aim of the paper is to justify a more positive verdict on Aristotle's arguments than is usual among commentators
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156852899321331761
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aristotle on Modality: Stephen Makin.Stephen Makin - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):143-161.
Aristotle on Modality, I.Stephen Makin - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):143–161.
Aristotle on Modality, II.Nicholas Denyer - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):163–178.
The Two-Dimensional Argument Against Materialism.David Chalmers - 2009 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Sven Walter (eds.), Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Aristotle's Megarian Manoeuvres.Kit Fine - 2011 - Mind 120 (480):993-1034.
Soames and Widescopism.David Hunter - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 123 (3):231 - 241.
Metaphysics XII 7, 1072A27-B1: An Argument of Identity.Laura M. Castelli - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):837-848.
Conversion Principles and the Basis of Aristotle's Modal Logic.Richard Patterson - 1990 - History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (2):151-172.
On the unity of modal syllogistics in Aristotle.Klaus J. Schmidt - 2008 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):54-86.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
39 ( #288,782 of 2,498,782 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #280,195 of 2,498,782 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes