Entitlement, opacity, and connection

In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 131 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper looks at the debates between internalism and externalism in mind and epistemology. In each realm, internalists face what we call 'The Connection Problem', while externalists face what we call 'The Problem of Opacity'. We offer an integrated account of thought content and epistemic warrant that overcomes the problems. We then apply the framework to debates between internalists and externalists in metaethics.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Opacity and Self-Consciousness.Michael Pendlebury - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):243-251.
Perceptual entitlement.Tyler Burge - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):503-48.
What is entitlement?Albert Casullo - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (4):267 - 279.
Perceptual Justification and Warrant by Default.Chris Tucker - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87: 445-63 87 (3):445-63.
The concept of entitlement and its epistemic relevance.Hamid Vahid - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3):380-399.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
523 (#31,858)

6 months
62 (#61,972)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sarah Sawyer
University of Sussex
Brad Majors
Baker University

Citations of this work

Minds and morals.Sarah Sawyer - 2014 - Philosophical Issues 24 (1):393-408.
Reliabilism and Brains in Vats.Jon Altschul - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (3):257-272.
Warum intellektuelle Toleranz nicht irrational ist.Dominik Balg - 2020 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):51-78.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references