The impossibility of local skepticism

Philosophia 34 (4):453-464 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


According to global skepticism, we know nothing. According to local skepticism, we know nothing in some particular area or domain of discourse. Unlike their global counterparts, local skeptics think they can contain our invincible ignorance within limited bounds. I argue that they are mistaken. Local skepticism, particularly the kinds that most often get defended, cannot stay local: if there are domains whose truths we cannot know, then there must be claims outside those domains that we cannot know even if they are true. My argument focuses on one popular form of local skepticism, ethical skepticism, but I believe that the argument generalizes to cover other forms as well.

Similar books and articles

Confucian Skepticism about Workplace Rights.Alan Strudler - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):67-83.
Local and Global Relativity Principles.Bradford Skow - 2008 - Philosophers' Imprint 8:1-14.
Exuberant skepticism.Paul Kurtz - 2010 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by John R. Shook.
Skepticism about practical reason.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):5-25.
Greek skepticism; a study in epistemology.Charlotte L. Stough - 1969 - Berkeley,: University of California Press.
The Local Nature of Modern Moral Skepticism.Diego E. Machuca - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):315–324.


Added to PP

839 (#18,632)

6 months
83 (#61,165)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Maitzen
Acadia University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references