Philosophical Explorations 14 (1):99-116 (2011)

Authors
Chauncey Maher
Dickinson College
Abstract
How or in virtue of what does any one particular action differ from another? Available views on the issue of action individuation tend to emphasize the descriptive features of actions, such as where and when they occur, or what they cause or are caused by. I contend instead that actions are individuated by their normative features, such as what licenses them and what they license in turn. In this essay, deploying a suggestion from Sellars and Brandom, I argue specifically that actions are individuated by their normative function or role.
Keywords Action  Individuating actions  Normative functionalsim  Wilfrid Sellars
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13869795.2011.544396
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Actions, Reasons, and Causes.Donald Davidson - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (23):685.

View all 66 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

De Se Content and Action Generalisation.Víctor M. Verdejo - 2017 - Philosophical Papers 46 (2):315-344.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Act Individuation: An Experimental Approach.Joseph Ulatowski - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (2):249-262.
Normative Functionalism About Intentional Action.Chauncey Maher - 2012 - Normative Functionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
Reasons, Values, and Rational Actions.Paul K. Moser - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:127-151.
The Normativity of Action.Mark Rowlands - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (3):401-416.
Normative Functionalism in the Pittsburgh School.Patrick J. Reider - 2012 - Normative Functionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
The Normative Core of Paternalism.Kalle Grill - 2007 - Res Publica 13 (4):441-458.
Norm and Law in the Theory of Action.Ruth Macklin - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):400 – 409.
Tales of the Mighty Tautologists?Frank Scalambrino - 2012 - Normative Funtionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
Problems in the Explanation of Action.Donald Davidson - 1987 - In Philip Pettit, Richard Sylvan & J. Norman (eds.), Metaphysics and Morality. Blackwell.
Why Animals Don’T Speak.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):463-485.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-04-01

Total views
183 ( #65,141 of 2,519,701 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #52,794 of 2,519,701 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes