Perceiving the infinite and the infinitesimal world: Unveiling and optical diagrams in mathematics [Book Review]

Foundations of Science 10 (1):7-23 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many important concepts of the calculus are difficult to grasp, and they may appear epistemologically unjustified. For example, how does a real function appear in “small” neighborhoods of its points? How does it appear at infinity? Diagrams allow us to overcome the difficulty in constructing representations of mathematical critical situations and objects. For example, they actually reveal the behavior of a real function not “close to” a point (as in the standard limit theory) but “in” the point. We are interested in our research in the diagrams which play an optical role –microscopes and “microscopes within microscopes”, telescopes, windows, a mirror role (to externalize rough mental models), and an unveiling role (to help create new and interesting mathematical concepts, theories, and structures). In this paper we describe some examples of optical diagrams as a particular kind of epistemic mediator able to perform the explanatory abductive task of providing a better understanding of the calculus, through a non-standard model of analysis. We also maintain they can be used in many other different epistemological and cognitive situations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Figures, Formulae, and Functors.Zach Weber - 2013 - In Sun-Joo Shin & Amirouche Moktefi (eds.), Visual Reasoning with Diagrams. Springer. pp. 153--170.
Mathematical activity.M. Giaquinto - 2005 - In Paolo Mancosu, Klaus Frovin Jørgensen & S. A. Pedersen (eds.), Visualization, Explanation and Reasoning Styles in Mathematics. Springer. pp. 75-87.
Why feynman diagrams represent.Letitia Meynell - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):39 – 59.
Peirce and the logical status of diagrams.Sun-joo Shin - 1994 - History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (1):45-68.
Diagrams and proofs in analysis.Jessica Carter - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1 – 14.
Diagrams as sketches.Brice Halimi - 2012 - Synthese 186 (1):387-409.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#241,099)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lorenzo Magnani
Universita' degli Studi di Pavia

References found in this work

Non-standard Analysis.Gert Heinz Müller - 2016 - Princeton University Press.
Conceptual Revolutions.Paul Thagard - 1992 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Collected papers.Charles S. Peirce - 1931 - Cambridge,: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Abduction, Reason, and Science.L. Magnani - 2001 - Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

View all 18 references / Add more references