Plotinus' epistemology and his reading of the «theaetetus»


The thesis offers a reconstruction of Plotinus' reading of the Theaetetus, and it presents an account of his epistemology that rests on that reading. It aims to show that Plotinus reads the Theaetetus as containing two anti-sceptical arguments. The first argument is an answer to radical scepticism, namely, to the thesis that nothing is apprehensible and judgement must be suspended on all matters. The second argument is an answer to a more moderate form of scepticism, which does not endorse a universal suspension of judgement, but maintains nonetheless that scientific knowledge is unattainable.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.


Added to PP

60 (#199,780)

6 months
2 (#298,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Platonic Causes.David Sedley - 1998 - Phronesis 43 (2):114-132.
Reasons and causes in the phaedo.Gregory Vlastos - 1969 - Philosophical Review 78 (3):291-325.
The Stoic Criterion of Identity.David Sedley - 1982 - Phronesis 27 (3):255-275.
Why Aristotle Needs Imagination.Victor Caston - 1996 - Phronesis 41 (1):20-55.
The double explanation in the timaeus.Steven K. Strange - 1985 - Ancient Philosophy 5 (1):25-39.

View all 26 references / Add more references