- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? or a study on identity crises
Annals of Mathematical Logic 10 (1):33-57 (1976)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Identity crises and strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter & James Cummings - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1895-1910.
On the indestructibility aspects of identity crisis.Grigor Sargsyan - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (6):493-513.
Identity crises and strong compactness III: Woodin cardinals. [REVIEW]Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (3):307-322.
Inner models with large cardinal features usually obtained by forcing.Arthur W. Apter, Victoria Gitman & Joel David Hamkins - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (3-4):257-283.
On some questions concerning strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (7-8):819-829.
MRP , tree properties and square principles.Remi Strullu - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (4):1441-1452.
More on the Least Strongly Compact Cardinal.Arthur W. Apter - 1997 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (3):427-430.
Level by level inequivalence beyond measurability.Arthur W. Apter - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (7-8):707-712.
Large Cardinals and Ramifiability for Directed Sets.R. Hinnion & O. Esser - 2000 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (1):25-34.
Strongly unfoldable cardinals made indestructible.Thomas A. Johnstone - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1215-1248.
Universal indestructibility for degrees of supercompactness and strongly compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (2):133-142.
Indestructibility, instances of strong compactness, and level by level inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (7-8):725-741.
The least measurable can be strongly compact and indestructible.Arthur W. Apter & Moti Gitik - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1404-1412.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-17
Downloads
29 (#536,973)
6 months
1 (#1,510,037)
2014-01-17
Downloads
29 (#536,973)
6 months
1 (#1,510,037)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
On Restrictions of Ultrafilters From Generic Extensions to Ground Models.Moti Gitik & Eyal Kaplan - 2023 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 88 (1):169-190.
Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter & Joel David Hamkins - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):820-840.
Closed and unbounded classes and the härtig quantifier model.Philip D. Welch - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (2):564-584.
References found in this work
On strong compactness and supercompactness.Telis K. Menas - 1975 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 7 (4):327-359.
From Accessible to Inaccessible Cardinals.H. J. Keisler & A. Tarski - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (3):411-411.
Some applications of iterated ultrapowers in set theory.Kenneth Kunen - 1970 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 1 (2):179.
Boolean extensions and measurable cardinals.K. Kunen - 1971 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 2 (4):359.
Some strong axioms of infinity incompatible with the axiom of constructibility.Frederick Rowbottom - 1971 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 3 (1):1.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo