Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing?

BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):1-8 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background Rationing and allocation decisions at the clinical level – bedside rationing – entail complex dilemmas that clinicians and managers often find difficult to handle. There is a lack of mechanisms and aids for promoting fair decisions, especially in hard cases. Reports indicate that clinical ethics committees sometimes handle cases that involve bedside rationing dilemmas. Can CECs have a legitimate role to play in bedside rationing? Main text Aided by two frameworks for legitimate priority setting, we discuss how CECs can contribute to enhanced epistemic, procedural and political legitimacy in bedside rationing decisions. Drawing on previous work we present brief case vignettes and outline several potential roles that CECs may play, and then discuss whether these might contribute to rationing decisions becoming legitimate. In the process, key prerequisites for such legitimacy are identified. Legitimacy places demands on aspects such as the CEC’s deliberation process, the involvement of stakeholders, transparency of process, the opportunity to appeal decisions, and the competence of CEC members. On these conditions, CECs can help strengthen the legitimacy of some of the rationing decisions clinicians and managers have to make. Conclusions On specified conditions, CECs can have a well-justified advisory role to play in order to enhance the legitimacy of bedside rationing decisions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confessions of a bedside rationer: Commentary on Hurst and Danis.Peter A. Ubel - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):267-269.
The clinical ethicist at the bedside.John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Rationing, inefficiency and the role of clinicians.Kristin Voigt - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):94-96.
A framework for rationing by clinical judgment.Samia A. Hurst & Marion Danis - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):247-266.
Context and scale: Distinctions for improving debates about physician “rationing”.Jon C. Tilburt & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2017 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2017 12:1 12 (1):5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-20

Downloads
12 (#929,749)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?