How to avoid the liaison dangereuse between post-colonialism and postmodernism

Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (4):493-504 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Post-colonial theories present narratives of discontent based on resentment toward colonial exploitation and cultural hegemony. The substance matter of post-colonial narratives (their first-order argument) is sound. Post-colonial theories often rely on a post-modern philosophical argumentative structure (their second-order argument). The second-order argument is not able to support the first-order argument. In particular, the nihilist consequences of post-modernism make impossible the construction of a (post-colonial) discourse through which the discontent is transformed in a basis for a reasonable political action. The lack of such a discourse is a source of intellectual despair and predisposes to political fragmentation. Moreover, protest without arguments often coincides with violence. Within a liberal view of justice it is possible to represent post-colonialism as a critical stance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,439

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-27

Downloads
41 (#384,230)

6 months
10 (#396,519)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Communities and the individual: Beyond the liberal–communitarian divide.Volker Kaul - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (4):392-401.
Global justification and local legitimation.Sebastiano Maffettone - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):239-257.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references