“Nothingness or a God”: Nihilism, Enlightenment, and “Natural Reason” in Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi’s Works

Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 5 (2):279-297 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our paper analyzes one of the most important philosophical problems of the philosophies of the Enlightenment: the problem of the emergence and the justification of the autonomy of reason. Our study will reflect on the critique of the autonomous reason, a critique brought by the Enlightenment thinkers themselves. Kant is one example of criticizing, and moreover securing the status of reason in the Enlightenment. Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, however, was not only an adversary of transcendental philosophy, but also a radical critic of the concept of ‘reason.’ In Jacobi’s works, reason faced a powerful critique of its own mechanisms of justification. Jacobi’s main thesis is that reason is threatened by the prospect of nihilism lurking from inside its main body of axioms. His critique against nihilism from the point of view of a believer is nothing new to the history of ideas, but here the direction of the critique changes against the vein of the Modern Age’s mainstream views with respect to the relation between reason and faith: reason’s own standards of truth are deemed as incapable of securing a safe place for reason against the prospect of an overwhelming nihilism. Thus, Jacobi emphasizes again and again that reason or cognition must find its standard of truth outside itself, or else it must face the scene of nothingness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dialectic of Enlightenment and the Proposal of a "Normative Horizon" of Reason [Spanish].Javier Roberto Suárez - 2013 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 18:148-177.
Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered.Alexander von Schoenborn - 1991 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (2):101-116.
Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered.Alexander von Schoenborn - 1991 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (2):101-116.
Desdemona's Lie: Nihilism, Perfectionism, Historicism.Paul Franks - 2013 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44 (2):225-245.
Dead or alive?: Reflective versus unreflective traditions.John W. Tate - 1997 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (4):71-91.
Liberalism and enlightenment in eighteenth‐century Germany.James Schmidt - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):31-53.
Enlightenment and freedom.Jonathan Peterson - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 223-244.
Kant's Philosophy of Communication by G. L. Ercolini.Samuel A. Stoner - 2018 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 51 (3):315-320.
Pure Reason’s Autonomy.Laura J. Mueller - 2018 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy.
The "world" of the enlightenment to come.Jacques Derrida - 2003 - Research in Phenomenology 33 (1):9-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
9 (#1,080,087)

6 months
4 (#320,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1998 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by J. M. D. Meiklejohn. Translated by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Critique of Pure Reason.Wolfgang Schwarz - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (3):449-451.
Nietzsche.Martin Heidegger - 1979 - [San Francisco]: HarperSanFrancisco. Edited by David Farrell Krell.

View all 10 references / Add more references