Benevolent absolutisms, incentives and Rawls’ The Law of Peoples

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (4):379-404 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rawls’ The Law of Peoples does not offer a clear principled account of the way in which liberal and decent peoples should deal with benevolent absolutisms. Within the Rawlsian framework, benevolent absolutisms are a type of society that respects basic human rights and is not externally aggressive. Rawls rules out the use of coercion to engage with benevolent absolutisms but does not provide an alternative strategy. The article develops one, namely, it argues that liberal and decent peoples should use positive incentives to induce benevolent absolutisms to make their transition to the status of well-ordered peoples. In so doing, it offers a principled way to expand Rawls’ international nonideal theory and, in the process, provides a more nuanced approach to the promotion of political participation in international society. The article draws on the literature on economic statecraft and political theory and constructs an incentive model with seven distinct parameters attached to its definition of incentives. Finally, the article provides a real-world example, of how to concretely implement the incentive mechanism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rawls, reasonableness, and international toleration.Thomas Porter - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (4):382-414.
Rawls and the outlaws.Henry Shue - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):307-323.
Toleration, decency and self-determination in The Law of Peoples.Pietro Maffettone - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (6):537-556.
La posición original de The Law of Peoples de John Rawls como postura etnocéntrica rortiana.William Farfán Moreno - 2010 - Logos: Revista de la Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades 17:115-131.
Rawls and Natural Justice.Dong Jin Jang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 29:31-43.
The Law of Peoples: Beyond Incoherence and Apology.Pietro Maffettone - 2011 - Journal of International Political Theory 7 (2):190-211.
Rawls and Natural Justice.Dong Jin Jang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 29:31-43.
Political Liberalism, Constructivism, and Global Justice.Alexander Kaufman - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (5):621-1.
Can Rawls’s Nonideal Theory Save his Ideal Theory?Hye Ryoung Kang - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (1):32-56.
Can Rawls’s Non-Ideal Theory Save his Ideal Theory?Hye-Ryoung Kang - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (1):32-56.
Public Reason and International Friendship.P. E. Digeser - 2009 - Journal of International Political Theory 5 (1):22-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-16

Downloads
17 (#846,424)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Justice as fairness: a restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Liberalism Without Perfection.Jonathan Quong - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.C. L. Ten - 2003 - Mind 112 (447):563-566.

View all 30 references / Add more references