- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals?Junhua Dang - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Oxytocin drives prosocial biases in favor of attractive people.René Hurlemann, Dirk Scheele, Wolfgang Maier & Johannes Schultz - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Moving forward with interdisciplinary research on attractiveness-related biases.Dario Maestripieri, Andrea Henry & Nora Nickels - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Evolutionary psychology and standard social science model.M. Popper - 2003 - Filozofia 58 (1):10-22.
Evolutionary explanations for financial and prosocial biases: Beyond mating motivation.Anthony C. Little - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Explaining God Away?Kelly James Clark - 2010 - In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 514--526.
How should we tackle financial and prosocial biases against unattractive people?Francesca Minerva - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Human Morality and Sociality: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives.Henrik Høgh-Olesen (ed.) - 2010 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
One path to balance and order in social psychology: An evolutionary perspective.Douglas T. Kenrick & Jon K. Maner - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):346-347.
Tinbergen's “four questions” provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people.Ian D. Stephen, Darren Burke & Danielle Sulikowski - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Evolutionary Psychology: History and Current Status.Paul E. Griffiths - 2006 - In Jessica Pfeifer & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. pp. 263--268.
Psychology and the Other special issue.David M. Goodman & Mark Freeman - 2012 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 32 (4):193-195.
Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field.Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer (eds.) - 2010 - MIT Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-03-26
Downloads
13 (#774,968)
6 months
2 (#324,005)
2017-03-26
Downloads
13 (#774,968)
6 months
2 (#324,005)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Sympathetic Plot, Its Psychological Origins, and Implications for the Evolution of Fiction.Manvir Singh - 2021 - Emotion Review 13 (3):183-198.
The Interplay Between Economic Status and Attractiveness, and the Importance of Attire in Mate Choice Judgments.Amany Gouda-Vossos, Robert C. Brooks & Barnaby J. W. Dixson - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles.Qun Yang, Bing Zhu, Qian Zhang, Yuchao Wang, Ruiheng Hu, Shengmin Liu & Delin Sun - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
References found in this work
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.David M. Buss - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (1):1-14.
Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating.David M. Buss & David P. Schmitt - 1993 - Psychological Review 100 (2):204-232.
Friend or foe: The effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.Mascha Van’T. Wout & Alan G. Sanfey - 2008 - Cognition 108 (3):796-803.
Discriminative parental solicitude and the relevance of evolutionary models to the analysis of motivational systems.Martin Daly & Margo Wilson - 1995 - In Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. MIT Press. pp. 1269--1286.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5c86f9596c-qsn25 N