Human Affairs 23 (4):645-657 (2013)

Roman Madzia
Masaryk University
The paper proposes an outline of a reconciliatory approach to the perennial controversy between epistemological realism and anti-realism. My main conceptual source in explaining this view is the philosophy of pragmatism, more specifically, the epistemological theories of George H. Mead, John Dewey, and also William James’ radical empiricism. First, the paper analyzes the pragmatic treatment of the goal-directedness of action, especially with regard to Mead’s notion of attitudes, and relates it to certain contemporary epistemological theories provided by the cognitive sciences. Against this background, the paper presents a philosophical as well as empirical justification of why we should interpret the environment and its objects in terms of possibilities for action. In Mead’s view, the objects and events of our world emerge within stable patterns of organism-environment interactions, which he called “perspectives”. According to pragmatism as well as the aforementioned cognitive scientists, perception and other cognitive processes include not only neural processes in our heads but also the world itself. Elaborating on Mead’s concept of perspectives, the paper argues in favor of the epistemological position called “constructive realism.”
Keywords pragmatism  embodied cognition  realism  anti-realism  constructionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2478/s13374-013-0155-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2005 - MIT Press.
Art as Experience.John Dewey - 1934 - G. Allen & Unwin.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Embodied Critical Realism.Kevin Schilbrack - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (1):167-179.
Non-Representationalist Cognitive Science and Realism.Karim Zahidi - 2014 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (3):461-475.
Sartre and Realism-All-the-Way-Down.John Duncan - 2005 - Sartre Studies International 11 (s 1-2):91-113.
Pragmatism and Anti-Realism About the Past.Shaun O'Dwyer - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (3):401-422.
Realism: Metaphysical, Scientific, and Semantic.Panu Raatikainen - 2014 - In Kenneth R. Westphal (ed.), Realism, Science, and Pragmatism. Routledge. pp. 139-158.
Constructive Empiricism and Anti-Realism.Sam Mitchell - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:174 - 180.
From Alethic Anti-Realism to Alethic Realism.Wolfgang Künne - 2002 - In James Conant & Urszula Żegleń (eds.), Hilary Putnam: Pragmatism and realism. Routledge. pp. 144--65.
Realism Without Empiricism.Patricia Hanna - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 17:65-73.


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #318,030 of 2,518,488 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,488 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes