Informal Logic 31 (4):262-278 (2011)
Abstract |
I finished my undergraduate degree at Monash University and joined Charles Hamblin’s seminar at the University of NSW in March, 1968. Phil Staines from the University of Newcastle joined at the same time, and Vic Dudman was an established member. Hamblin’s book Fallacies would be published in 1970, but the seminar discussions rarely concerned fallacies. This may have been because Hamblin had been working for so long and so closely with those ideas that he was now ready to turn elsewhere. But I shall argue that the book was only part of a much broader program, other parts of which occupied us in the seminars. Hamblin never explicitly discussed the writing of Fallacies with me, and what follows is an attempt to explain how the book fitted into his overall project as a logician, drawn from his published works and from what I remember of his contributions to the seminar
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
View all 40 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren, Erik Bart Garssen, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans C. W. Krabbe, Jean Bart Verheij & H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Similar books and articles
Argument Schemes From the Point of View of Hamblin's Dialectic.Jan A. van Laar - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):344-366.
Speech Act Rules for Burden of Proof in a Modified Hamblin Dialogue System.Douglas Walton - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):279-304.
Hamblin on the Standard Treatment of Fallacies.Douglas N. Walton - 1991 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (4):353 - 361.
Formal Dialectic in Fallacy Inquiry: An Unintelligible Circumscription of Argumentative Rationality? [REVIEW]Louise Cummings - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (2):161-183.
Hamblin's Case for Commitment: A Reply to Johnson.Jim Mackenzie & Phil Staines - 1999 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 32 (1):14 - 39.
Charles Leonard Hamblin, 1922-1985.Jim Mackenzie & Philip Staines - 1985 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63 (3):384.
Medieval Disputationes de Obligationibus as Formal Dialogue Systems.Sara L. Uckelman - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):143-166.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-04-19
Total views
36 ( #315,679 of 2,505,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,153 )
2013-04-19
Total views
36 ( #315,679 of 2,505,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,153 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads