- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Julius caesar objection : More problematic than ever
In Identity and Modality. Oxford University Press. pp. 174 (2006)
Abstract
This paper investigates the meta-ontological problem, what is the Julius Caesar objection? I distinguish epistemic, metaphysical and semantic versions. I argue that neo-Fregean and supervaluationist solutions to the Caesar objection fails because, amongst other flaws, they fail to determine which version of the problem is in play.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Revaluation of Julius Caesar Wolfgang Will: Julius Caesar: Eine Bilanz. (Urban-Taschen-bücher, Bd. 448.) Pp. 318; 2 maps, 6 tables. Stuttgart, Berlin and Cologne: Kohlhammer, 1992. DM 30. [REVIEW]John Carter - 1993 - The Classical Review 43 (02):343-345.
Fowler's Julius Caesar_- Julius Caesar and the Foundation of the Roman Imperial System, by W. Warde Fowler, M.A. G. P. Putnam's Sons. 1892. 5 _s. [REVIEW]E. S. Beesly - 1892 - The Classical Review 6 (09):406-407.
C. Julius Caesar C. Julius Caesar: Sein Leben nach den Quellen kritisch dargestellt. Von E. G. Sihler, Professor an der New York University. 8vo. Pp. viii + 274. Leipzig and Berlin: B. G. Teubner, 1912. M. 6. [REVIEW]W. W. How - 1913 - The Classical Review 27 (05):170-171.
The Julius Caesar objection.Richard Heck - 1997 - In Richard G. Heck (ed.), Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett. Oxford University Press. pp. 273--308.
Buchan's Caesar John Buchan: Julius Caesar. Pp. 170. London: Nelson, 1938. Cloth, 1s. 6d.C. G. Stone - 1938 - The Classical Review 52 (05):188-.
Crackpot Caesar J. F. C. Fuller: Julius Caesar, Man, Soldier, and Tyrant. Pp. 336; 18 maps and diagrams. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1965. Cloth, 42s. net. [REVIEW]J. P. V. D. Balsdon - 1966 - The Classical Review 16 (02):217-220.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
90 (#185,748)
6 months
12 (#200,125)
2009-01-28
Downloads
90 (#185,748)
6 months
12 (#200,125)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Foundations for Mathematical Structuralism.Uri Nodelman & Edward N. Zalta - 2014 - Mind 123 (489):39-78.
Rayo’s Metametaphysics.Matti Eklund - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (4):483-497.
The Caesar Problem — A Piecemeal Solution.J. P. Studd - 2023 - Philosophia Mathematica 31 (2):236-267.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo