The Gettier Intuition from South America to Asia

Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (3):517-541 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines whether people share the Gettier intuition (viz. that someone who has a true justified belief that p may nonetheless fail to know that p) in 24 sites, located in 23 countries (counting Hong-Kong as a distinct country) and across 17 languages. We also consider the possible influence of gender and personality on this intuition with a very large sample size. Finally, we examine whether the Gettier intuition varies across people as a function of their disposition to engage in “reflective” thinking.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases.Jennifer Nagel - 2012 - In Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions. Oxford University Press.
What good are counterexamples?Brian Weatherson - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (1):1-31.
‘Unlucky’ Gettier Cases.Jim Stone - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):421-430.
What Should a Theory of Knowledge Do?Elijah Chudnoff - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (4):561-579.
Intuition in Gettier.Elijah Chudnoff - forthcoming - In Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Classic Philosophical Arguments: The Gettier Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss.
Non-Pickwickian Belief and 'the Gettier Problem'.John Biro - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (1):47-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-10

Downloads
1,104 (#11,141)

6 months
122 (#28,747)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Rose
Stanford University
Hyundeuk Cheon
Seoul National University
Daniel Cohnitz
Utrecht University
2 more

Citations of this work

Cross-Cultural Convergence of Knowledge Attribution in East Asia and the US.Yuan Yuan & Minsun Kim - 2023 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14 (1):267-294.
Responses to Herman Cappelen and Jennifer Nado.Edouard Machery - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 179 (1):329-342.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations