The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants
Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):197-200 (2007)
Abstract
Although it is commonly believed that the concept of brain death was developed to benefit organ transplants, it evolved independently. Transplantation owed its development to advances in surgery and immunosuppressive treatment; BD owed its origin to the development of intensive care. The first autotransplant was achieved in the early 1900s, when studies of increased intracranial pressure causing respiratory arrest with preserved heartbeat were reported. Between 1902 and 1950, the BD concept was supported by the discovery of EEG, Crile’s definition of death, the use of EEG to demonstrate abolition of brain potentials after ischaemia, and Crafoord’s statement that death was due to cessation of blood flow. Transplantation saw the first xenotransplant in humans and the first unsuccessful kidney transplant from a cadaver. In the 1950s, circulatory arrest in coma was identified by angiography, and the death of the nervous system and coma dépassé were described. Murray performed the first successful kidney transplant. In the 1960s, the BD concept and organ transplants were instantly linked when the first kidney transplant using a brain-dead donor was performed; Schwab proposed to use EEG in BD; the Harvard Committee report and the Sydney Declaration appeared; the first successful kidney, lung and pancreas transplants using cadaveric donors were achieved; Barnard performed the first human heart transplant. This historical review demonstrates that the BD concept and organ transplantation arose separately and advanced in parallel, and only began to progress together in the late 1960s. Therefore, the BD concept did not evolve to benefit transplantation.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants (vol 33, pg 197, 2007).Calixto Machado, Julius Kerein, Yazmina Ferrer, Liana Portela & Maria de la C. Garcia - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6):369-369.
The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants.C. Machado, J. Kerein, Y. Ferrer, L. Portela, M. de la C. Garcia & J. M. Manero - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):197-200.
A definition of human death should not be related to organ transplants * Commentary.C. Machado - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):201-202.
A Definition Of Human Death Should Not Be Related To Organ Transplants.C. Machado, I. Kerridge, P. Saul, M. Lowe & J. McPhee - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):201-202.
Arguments against promoting organ transplants from brain-dead donors, and views of contemporary japanese on life and death.Atsushi Asai, Yasuhiro Kadooka & Kuniko Aizawa - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (4):215-223.
The biophilosophical basis of whole-brain death.James L. Bernat - 2002 - Soc Philos Policy 19 (2):324-42.
The Biophilosophical Basis Of Whole-brain Death.James Bernat - 2002 - Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):324-342.
Reconsidering Brain Death: A Lesson from Japan's Fifteen Years of Experience.Masahiro Morioka - 2001 - Hastings Center Report 31 (4):41-46.
Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule.Mike Collins - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):1-26.
Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death.I. H. Kerridge - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):89.
A Survey On The Attitudes Of 252 Japanese Nurses 72 Towards Organ Transplantation And Brain Death.Ralph Seewald - 2000 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 10 (3):72-75.
Brain Death - Too Flawed to Endure, Too Ingrained to Abandon.Robert D. Truog - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):273-281.
Current debate on the ethical issues of brain death.Masahiro Morioka - 2004 - Proceedings of International Congress on Ethical Issues in Brain Death and Organ Transplantation:57-59.
The ethics of donation and transplantation: are definitions of death being distorted for organ transplantation?Ari R. Joffe - 2007 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2:28.
Death Revisited: Rethinking Death and the Dead Donor Rule.A. S. Iltis & M. J. Cherry - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3):223-241.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-17
Downloads
4 (#1,239,317)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
2017-02-17
Downloads
4 (#1,239,317)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Are Brain Dead Individuals Dead? Grounds for Reasonable Doubt.E. Christian Brugger - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3):329-350.
The Spatio-Legal Production of Bodies Through the Legal Fiction of Death.Joshua David Michael Shaw - 2021 - Law and Critique 32 (1):69-90.
East–West Differences in Perception of Brain Death: Review of History, Current Understandings, and Directions for Future Research.Qing Yang & Geoffrey Miller - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):211-225.
Eugène Bouchut’s (1818–1891) Early Anticipation of the Concept of Brain Death.Toni Saad - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (3):407-423.