Aufklärung 7 (2) (2020)

Abstract
This paper turns to the concept of constitution and some to it more immediately related notions contained in R. Carnap's Aufbau and Husserl's works that might have had some influence there, in order to find similarities and differences between them. It hopefully will contribute to this assessment of the plausible hypothesis, recently raised in the literature, of an influence of the father of phenomenology not explicitly sufficiently credited in Aufbau. The argumentative strategy was to expose, firstly in a separate way, the relevant points in each strand and then to make the comparative examination. This first analysis took place by two general aspects, namely, to address, on the one hand, the very relation of constitution and what is a system of it and, given the implicated foundationalism attributed to such notion, the data which are at the base of system like this. Then I move on to examine the differences and similarities between such expositions. As result, similarities were observed in that the two of them imply a broader thesis of foundationalism; they propose, in this, to an encompassing system. In addition, they contend that the fact that there is a difference between a lower-level object and a higher-level object does not imply between them mereological composition or some necessary commonality of properties. However, there are also differences regarding the kind of relationship that the notions of constituting imply in each case. Distinctions were also found about the role of sensations in each system; but in that sense, there is, in both perspectives, also similarities concerning their status. The paper concludes with the notion that there must be husserlian influences in the Aufbau not sufficiently credited. However, it is unreasonable the diagnosis of extreme importance of Husserl's influence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Reserved Reading of Carnap's Aufbau.Christopher Pincock - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):518–543.
The Justification of Concepts in Carnap's Aufbau.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):671-689.
L'intentionnalité dans l'Aufbau de Carnap.Élisabeth Schwartz - 2016 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 114 (3):547-578.
Anomalous Monism in Carnap's.Mehdi Nasrin - 2004 - Erkenntnis:283-293.
The Constitution of Space and Time in the Aufbau Viewed From a Kantian Perspective.Yusuke Kaneko - 2014 - Journal of the Philosophy of Science Society, Japan 47 (1):19-36.
Anomalous Monism in Carnap's Aufbau.Mehdi Nasrin - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (3):283-293.
Empiricist and Neo-Kantian Elements in the Aufbau.Saniye Vatansever - 2020 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):451-468.
New Life for Carnap’s Aufbau?Hannes Leitgeb - 2011 - Synthese 180 (2):265-299.
Was Carnap a Complete Verificationist in the Aufbau?Richard Creath - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:384 - 393.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-16

Total views
2 ( #1,422,129 of 2,461,919 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,784 of 2,461,919 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes