Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition

Argumentation 36 (3):317-343 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The phrase _secundum quid et simpliciter_ is the Latin expression translating and labelling the sophism described by Aristotle as connected with the use of some particular expression “absolutely or in a certain respect and not in its proper sense.” This paper presents an overview of the analysis of this fallacy in the history of dialectics, reconstructing the different explanations provided in the Aristotelian texts, the Latin and medieval dialectical tradition, and the modern logical approaches. The _secundum quid_ emerges as a strategy that is based on the pragmatic dimension of arguments, and in particular the complex passage from an utterance (what is said) to its logical form (a proposition in an argument). The medieval and modern logical theories attempted to explain from different philosophical perspectives how the pragmatically enriched semantic representation can be achieved, justified, and most importantly manipulated. The different analyses of this fallacy bring to light various dimensions of the pragmatics of arguments, and the complex interdependence between context, meaning, and inferences.

Similar books and articles

Without Qualification: An Inquiry Into the Secundum Quid.David Botting - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):161-170.
Общие высказывания.И. А Герасимова - 2009 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 20 (2):175-189.
A dialectical approach to presupposition.Fabrizio Macagno - 2018 - Intercultural Pragmatics 15 (2):291-313.
Moral Dilemmas and Moral Luck.Timothy John Dunn - 2001 - Dissertation, Rice University


Added to PP

176 (#76,140)

6 months
176 (#4,482)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabrizio Macagno
Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - London, England: Vale Press.
Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.
Unarticulated constituents.François Recanati - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):299-345.
Elements of Logic.Richard Whately - 1826 - London, England: Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints.

View all 53 references / Add more references