Bioethics 34 (8):771-784 (2020)

Authors
Nancy Jecker
University of Washington
Douglas MacKay
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Abstract
Controlled human infection (CHI) studies involve the deliberate exposure of healthy research participants to infectious agents to study early disease processes and evaluate interventions under controlled conditions with high efficiency. Although CHI studies expose participants to the risk of infection, they are designed to offer investigators unique advantages for studying the pathogenesis of infectious diseases and testing potential vaccines or treatments in humans. One of the central challenges facing investigators involves the fair selection of research subjects to participate in CHI studies. While there is widespread agreement that investigators have a duty to select research participants fairly, this principle also yields conflicting ethical imperatives, for example requiring investigators to both exclude potential participants with co‐morbidities since they face increased risks, but also to include them in order to ensure generalizability. In this paper we defend an account of fair subject selection that is tailored to the context of CHI studies. We identify the considerations of fairness that bear directly on selecting participants for CHI studies and provide investigators and members of IRBs and RECs with a principled way to navigate the conflicting imperatives to which these considerations give rise.
Keywords challenge studies  controlled human infection studies  fair subject selection  research ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12778
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Autistic Traits and Sensitivity to Human-Like Features of Robot Behavior.Agnieszka Wykowska, Jasmin Kajopoulos, Karinne Ramirez-Amaro & Gordon Cheng - 2015 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 16 (2):219-248.
Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection.Katherine Witte Saylor & Douglas MacKay - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):5-19.
Acupuncture Trials and Informed Consent.F. G. Miller & T. J. Kaptchuk - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):43-44.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-16

Total views
10 ( #903,150 of 2,518,486 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,486 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes