Self-ownership, marxism, and egalitarianism: Part I: Challenges to historical entitlement

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (1):75-108 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This two-part article offers a defense of a libertarian doctrine that centers on two propositions. The first is the self-ownership thesis according to which each individual possesses original moral rights over her own body, faculties, talents, and energies. The second is the anti-egalitarian conclusion that, through the exercise of these rights of self-ownership, individuals may readily become entitled to substantially unequal extra-personal holdings. The self-ownership thesis remains in the background during Part I of this essay, while the anti-egalitarian conclusion is supported in two ways. First, I offer a reconstruction of Robert Nozick's well-known `How Liberty Upsets Patterns' argument against all end-state and pattern theories of distributive justice; and I defend this reconstructed stance against what might (otherwise) seem to be telling criticisms. Second, I defend the two key principles of Nozickian historical entitlement theory (the principle of just transfer and the principle of just initial acquisition) against criticisms offered by G.A. Cohen. Part II will center on Cohen's contention that the crucial basis for the anti-egalitarian conclusion is the self-ownership thesis. There I argue that Cohen is correct to hold that he must reject the self-ownership thesis if he is to avoid the anti-egalitarian conclusion; but he is wrong to think that he has an adequate basis for rejecting this thesis. Thus, both elements in the libertarianism under consideration are vindicated. And, the self-ownership thesis plays a surprisingly direct role in vindicating the anti-egalitarian conclusion. Key Words: egalitarianism • historical entitlement • moral rights • self-ownership.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-ownership, freedom, and autonomy.George G. Brenkert - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (1):27-55.
Left-Libertarianism and Global Justice.Peter Vallentyne - 2001 - In Burton M. Leiser & Tom Campbell (eds.), Human Rights in Philosophy & Practice. Ashgate Publishing.
Property, Persons, Boundaries: The Argument from Other-Ownership.Hugh Breakey - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (2):189-210.
Locke and libertarian property rights: Reply to Weinberg.Am Feallsanach - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (3):319-323.
Personal identity and self-ownership.Edward Feser - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):100-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
194 (#99,535)

6 months
17 (#142,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Mack
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Citations of this work

The natural right of property.Eric Mack - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1):53-78.
Philosophical Approaches to Work and Labor.Michael Cholbi - 2022 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The deep error of political libertarianism: self-ownership, choice, and what’s really valuable in life.Dan Lowe - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (6):683-705.
Self-ownership and non-culpable proviso violations.Preston J. Werner - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (1):67-83.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references