Reply to William Dwyer: Free Will Reconsidered

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):215 - 220 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tibor R. Machan argues that William Dwyer's review of his book, Initiative: Human Agency and S odety (The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, Fall 2001), assumes that compatibilism is coherent. Machan argues that compatibilism is simply hard determinism with some soft edges but as such it is not coherent. In light of this, the agent-causation-based thesis of human initiative (or freedom of the human will) that Machan defends is superior to its alternatives

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do Knowledge, Ethics, and Liberty Require Free Will? [REVIEW]William Dwyer - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):83 - 108.
Reply to William Dwyer: Compatibilism and Evolution.George Lyons - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):205-213.
Initiative: human agency and society.Tibor R. Machan - 2000 - Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Another Look at Abortion.Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):449 - 456.
Egoism and benevolence. [REVIEW]Tibor R. Machan - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (2):283 - 291.
A veteran reconnoiters Ayn Rand's philosophy. [REVIEW]Robert L. Campbell - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (2):293-312.
Teaching Ayn Rand's Version of Ethical Egoism.Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):71 - 81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
9 (#1,187,161)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references