Response to Akagi, Hughes, and Springle [Book Review]

International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27 (4):608-623 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am extremely grateful to Mikio Akagi, Nick Hughes, and Alison Springle for their insightful and challenging comments on Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds (Machery 2017). In this response, I wil...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Finding the Bounds of Machery’s Critique. [REVIEW]Mikio Akagi - 2019 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27 (4):584-591.
Plantinga Defended.Charles T. Hughes - 2005 - Philosophia Christi 7 (1):177-188.
Placing Robert Hughes: A promissory note.Peter Beilharz - 2013 - Thesis Eleven 117 (1):117-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-24

Downloads
33 (#459,370)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edouard Machery
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

The Method of Cases: A Case Study.Mieszko Tałasiewicz - 2021 - Filozofia Nauki 29 (2):115-131.
Reply to Machery: Against the Argument from Citation.Jordan David Thomas Walters - 2021 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29 (2):181-184.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Philosophy of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2007 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Philosophy Within its Proper Bounds.Edouard Machery - 2017 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

View all 46 references / Add more references