Argumentation 28 (4):453-488 (2014)

Authors
Fabrizio Macagno
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Benedetta Zavatta
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Abstract
Metaphorical meaning can be analyzed as triggered by an apparent communicative breach, an incongruity that leads to a default of the presumptive interpretation of a vehicle. This breach can be solved through contextual renegotiations of meaning guided by the communicative intention, or rather the presumed purpose of the metaphorical utterance. This paper addresses the problem of analyzing the complex process of reasoning underlying the reconstruction of metaphorical meaning. This process will be described as a type of abductive argument, aimed at explaining how the vehicle can best contribute to the purpose of the utterance. This type of reasoning involves the analysis of the possible predicates that can be and usually are attributed to the vehicle, and the selection of the one that can support the implicit conclusion constituting the communicative goal of the metaphorical utterance. Metaphorical meaning, in this perspective, becomes the outcome of a complex process of meaning reconstruction aimed at providing the best explanation of the function of the vehicle within a discourse move
Keywords Metaphor  Relevance  Interpretation  Pragmatics  Argumentation  Argumentation schemes
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-014-9329-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 73 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Means-End Classification of Argumentation Schemes.Fabrizio Macagno - 2015 - In Frans van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory. Cham, Switzerland: pp. 183-201.
Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2015 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 48 (1): 26-53.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-07-22

Total views
60 ( #190,086 of 2,506,065 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #49,569 of 2,506,065 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes